| Internal Communications to Internal Marketing
|
Time was the responsibility for internal communications sat
either within the individual lines of management or within the
Corporate Public Affairs division.
Each campaign and or announcement was constructed almost entirely
from the company’s point of view.
Problem was that when the Moses raised the cheer and announced
each “bold” campaign or initiative as the key step
towards the promised land – the organisation just looked
on – there was no Mexican wave, the cynics sneering perceived
a new shape to the old wheel and the agnostics chorused “what
ever”.
The problem was that of “motivation” declared the
consultants – “you cannot just announce things to
the organisation – you have to motivate the organisation
into a positive response”
Let’s care, let’s share, let’s be open, let’s
be transparent, and let’s get cuddly!
And so the pendulum swung – from that of top down communication
to that of all embracing communication. Communication became an
end in itself. Paradigm shifts were integrated into all change
management programmes and the path of the great masses from denial
to depression and then onto greater glory was mapped and recorded.
Great ideals, great challenges, great possibilities – what
a shame about the delivery!
|
| |
Selling the message
|
| Fundamentally for an organisation, a brand or an idea to be
successful it has to “sell” itself to its target consumers,
or in the case of internal communications, to its employees.
Without the buy-in or support of the staff, the life expectancy
of most boards is limited to three years maximum.
When D-Day comes – look who’s right behind them –
well, not the staff.
Faced with such a critical “marketing” challenge
– is it possible that the revolutionary answer to effective
internal communications is simply to place the role and the responsibility
within the marketing department?
|
| |
|
Seven key principles of Internal Marketing
|
Moving internal communications into Marketing is in fact revolutionary
in that it constitutes an organisation’s acceptance of seven
key facts that govern the relationship it has with those who work
for it:
- The market (the staff) is made up of different target segments
whose “information and motivation” needs vary depending
on their work location, their level of sophistication, and the
direct impact or value they have in relation to the announcement.
Consequently, different levels, different channels and different
communications mechanisms might be required for each segment.
- Within the market for information there will be early adopters,
the vast majority and the laggards.
- The consumer (the employee) will already be pre-disposed to
or will be biased against based on historical events and attitudes.
- For any product (the announcement or initiative ) to be well
received it must be positioned and packaged in a format which
will appeal to the market (the staff).
- The communication needs to be strong enough to prevent the
audience being distracted by channel noise (other concerns)
and by the actions of the competition (the grapevine, the cynics,
and maybe even the individual line management).
- The company has generated the communication. It therefore
naturally “markets” the company line and the consumers
(the employees) are fully aware that they are being sold a particular
line. This does not mean that they will reject the information.
However, claims of communications neutrality and a non-bias
approach are not credible should be dropped before they undermine
the programme.
- The “pitch” will convince not all consumers. The
campaign needs to prioritise those segments that hold the most
value (for example, those involved in the sales, distribution
and customer service process) – rather than spend time
trying to convince the entire population.
|
| |
In Practice
|
| That’s all well and good for the big step-changes, but
can a marketing department really be trusted to run an on-going
communications programme?
Well, generally speaking the answer is no.
Marketers are project-orientated creatives. Their attention span,
interest levels and motivation do not make them well disposed
to running on-going or administration type programmes.
The ideal scenario for a growing number of organisations is to
have a dedicated “internal communications” role within
the marketing function which can be managed by a marketing ethos
and which can plug into key communication tools and practices
as and when required.
Internal Marketing is not yet a buzzword – but those without
it seem to suffer unnecessarily.
Copyright - AMG Ltd
|